Evan Sayet: The Language of Liberalism
Report by Betty Sakai
Comedian Evan Sayet returned by popular demand from January 2014 when he had focused on media misinformation and Liberalism. Focusing this time on the modern Liberal’s linguistic manipulation of the English language changing truths into untruths, Evan Sayet emphasized that Liberals are wrong -- as wrong as wrong can be – always.
Sayet instructed his audience to look for word modifiers. The English words: “justice”, “correct”, and “aggression” all have definitive meanings. Liberals intent on changing that meaning place a modifier in front of the word, and the original meaning of that word flips 180 degrees. He cited examples of modified words: “social justice”, “politically correct”, and “micro aggression”. Evan Sayet encouraged his audience to read his book The KinderGarden of Eden: How The Modern Liberal Thinks and Why He’s Convinced That Ignorance is Bliss to gain a more thorough understanding of those intent on doing them harm.
Evan Sayet discussed the Unified Field Theory of Liberalism. For some, it is easy to dismiss a Liberal as being stupid, but the fact is most Liberals are not stupid. Most are good and decent people who just get it wrong, as wrong as wrong can be. Discussing when this thinking began in America, after WWII it became a moral imperative to be indiscriminate. The Liberal began to believe that nothing is better than anything else. The young asked, “Why should anything be thought of better than anything else? Why should anything, or anyone, elevate themselves above anything, or anyone else?” By the 1980s, these children grew up to become the professors, the journalists, the lawyers, entertainers, and politicians. Thinking was made a hate crime because it was thought to be intrinsically biased by race, culture, ancestry, height, weight, age, the color of one’s skin, and one’s wealth. And the only way to stop bigotry in the Liberal’s mind was to never think at all.
The truth is today’s Liberal sides with failure over success, with wrong over right, with evil over good, with ugly over beautiful. If asked to side with Saddam Hussein or America, the Liberal will side with Saddam Hussein. If asked to side with Arafat or Israel, the Liberal will side with Arafat. The Liberal gains power within the group by debasing and vulgarizing society. For example, Obama bows down to the despotic King of Saudi Arabia but not to the Queen of England. Obama sides with evil over good again and again. He spreads the lie that Michael Brown’s hands were up, that he was not a thug high on drugs even though Obama knew that he was spreading a lie and this would result in dead cops. Why?
The Liberal believes that social justice demands that those who are exceptionally successful be punished, that society work on behalf of the exceptionally failed. Failure the Liberal sees as proof that those who have failed were victimized. Because the Liberal believes that success is not better than failure, injecting the modifier “social” in front of “justice” helps to paint nations like America and Israel as exceptionally evil. Democrats want to strangle the tiny little liberal [meaning not the same as Liberal] democracy of Israel which has produced Nobel Prize physicists, world class symphonies, skyscrapers, intellectuals, and many discoveries, including those in medicine. To the Modern Liberal, the successes of Israel are proof that Israel is exceptionally evil, and America is evil too.Democrats need for racism to exist in America. Democrats need for there to be aggression against blacks. But there is no aggression against blacks in America. It’s a lie. Democrats have pushed the lie that America is the most racist nation in the world and cops deserve to be murdered. Playing on the false narrative of racism is an attempt by financier George Soros to fund the tearing down of Western society, which he hates. If Democrats cannot find racism in America, they say it is institutionalized, that racism is spoken in secret code. One cannot hear the racism but everyone knows it’s there.
Democrats have to tear down and lie about the people who are good. They lie about the people who are bad and in their favor because, unless they do, the idea that everything is equally good disappears. Speaking the truth is an act of evil while lying is arguably truthful. Individual justice is despised. The modern Liberal believes in skin color because Liberals are racist. Liberals believe that people are defined by their race: “Black Lives Matter”, “La Raza” [the race], “Latina”, “white privilege”, “hate crime”, the muting of the 1st Amendment right to free speech by saying something is not “politically correct”. People other than Liberals just don’t think of other people in terms of the color of their skin.
Liberals like the concept of diversity. Diversity simply means “different”. Without critical judgement, diversity is meaningless. The fact is, people from all over the world have immigrated legally to America leaving behind everything they knew to embrace the good, to become part of America’s melting pot. Common behaviors have become America’s strength. If we accept diverse behaviors by removing critical judgement, then we are promoting lesser behaviors.
Liberals like to say they are “more capable of nuance”, meaning they reject the existence of good and evil and declare anyone evil who recognizes the existence of good and evil. When one says that Saddam Hussein and Adolf Hitler were evil, it is generally understood that their behaviors were at times not evil. But overall, their good behavior did not significantly mitigate their evil behavior.
In the Q&A Session, Evan Sayet generated much interest interacting with the audience. One person asked if Sayet had heard that the President had said it is easier to buy a glock than a book. Sayet answered, “Do you think Obama knows what a book is?”
About Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, Evan said that we have a choice for President of someone who will continue providing sanctuary for illegals or someone who will close the border. Seeing Trump as America’s only alternative, Evan Sayet asked, “Where is the sanctuary for American citizens?”
Evan Sayet called on his audience to work in the micro instead of the macro. He said, we have to take back what the Liberals have done. We have to re-educate those who have become America haters. He reminded listeners that we are called Conservatives because we wish to preserve our liberal values. He asked everyone to find one person in their life who doesn’t always hate America and raise that person as one would a child. Cautioning not to make every moment a teachable moment, he said that over time that person will change. He added, “I know this is possible. I have done this. I have changed Jews. If everyone changes just one person, we will double our numbers.”Liberals he mused shame those who disagree with them. At a Tea Party gathering, Sayet said he read a sign that said, “It doesn’t matter what this sign says. You will still call me a racist.” So long as it doesn’t matter, tell the truth. Without hate, he said, there would be no Democrat Party. Democrats hate the success of others because they think others will use their money to promote evil. Hillary Clinton exempts herself because she believes she will use her money for good. Politicians, reporters, lawyers, and actors just talk. They do not produce anything. They believe their money does not cause other people problems. Money created by those who produce things Liberals believe may cause problems.
Interestingly, the modern Liberal has been raised in an era where there are few communicable diseases. Evil is no longer the flu, measles, or polio. Hunger is no longer an issue. So, evil as viewed by the Liberal, are the things and the people that keep those things at bay. If there is no illness, then the evil is the pharmaceutical company. If there is no war, then the evil is the soldier. If there is no crime, then the evil is the cop. If there is no hunger, then the evil is Monsanto.
Nationalism, he said, has no moral value one way or another. But Socialism is always a problem, and international socialism is an extreme problem because there is no bulwark of nationalism to stand up against it. International socialism is extremely dangerous. Both Germany and England are nationalist states. We can thank God the British were patriots enough to stand up against Hitler. We can thank God Americans were nationalistic enough to stand up against Socialism’s big sister Communism during the cold war. If Americans had not recognized American exceptionalism, America would have given in to Russian Communism.
Asked why Jews are often Liberal, Sayet answered that unlike other religions, to be a Jew one only needs to be born of a Jewish mother. The vast majority of Jews in America do not belong to a synagogue. The vast majority have received no religious education. They have no understanding of what it means to be a Jew. Reform Jews may belong to a synagogue for social reasons. Only the Orthodox Jew understands and abides by Judaism. There is a direct correlation between Jews who understand and live their faith as Orthodox Jews and those who vote Republican. Most Orthodox Jews are Republicans. What we should understand, he added, is that modern Liberalism which is the ideology of the Democrat Party is the antithesis of Judaism.
Asked his opinion on global warming, Evan Sayet laughed and said it is man-made…by a man named Al Gore who lives lavishly and flies all over the globe. Global warming is an invention to strangle the productivity of the West. Sayet added, “If Liberal Hollywood really thought the oceans were rising, why would they live on the beach?”
In conclusion, Evan Sayet thanked his audience and admonished them to work on changing just one person. He repeated, “If we all change just one person, we will double our influence.” The Forum audience thanked Evan Sayet with standing applause followed by many standing in line to buy his book.
Read more at http://evansayet.com
Check out our past presentations!